Skip to main content

Faith in false name, false image and false practices




(Source of photo: Yaohú Servo Yaohushua’s facebook page).

Are you faithful believers of false name, false image and false religious doctrines and practices? Also, is there trinity of lies and deceptions in Jesus Christ, which makes the name merely a product of man's imagination and foolishness? Specifically, is Jesus Christ a real person in terms of authenticity of the name, authenticity of the image and validity of doctrines and practices being attached to him by false Christians?

Or was his name merely invented by the bible, his image merely created by Leonardo Da Vinci and the doctrines and practices being attached to him merely created by false Christians by deceptively stealing the Words of God and mis-using the story of the real messiah?

Related to the above issue is Habakkuk 2:12-14, which is a prophecy for Vatican City, being the headquarter of the Roman Catholicism. As a background, Habakkuk 2 prophecy refers to the judgment for United States (Habakkuk 2:4-8), United Kingdom (Habakkuk 2:15-17) Vatican City and France (Habakkuk 2:9-11).

Included in the prophecy is also a judgment for idolatrous nations, one of which is Brazil (Habakkuk 2:18-20), due to its “Christ the Redeemer” statue in Rio De Janeiro. Philippines and Nepal are also included. 

The verses for Vatican City state as follows:
12 You are doomed! You founded a city on crime and built it up by murder. 13 The nations you conquered wore themselves out in useless labor, and all they have built goes up in flames. The Lord Almighty has done this. 14 But the earth will be as full of the knowledge of the Lord’s glory as the seas are full of water.(Habakkuk 2:12-14, Today's English Version)
Verse 12 pertains to the foundation of a city based on crime and murder, which Vatican City would easily qualify due to its historical past, e.g killing of early Christians by its predecessor-the Roman empire and killing of Jews, Muslims and other opposing groups through the crusades and other religious wars. In short, verse 12 expressly refers to the use of military or physical force.

But verse 13 refers to the influence of conqueror in the adoption of a form of belief or faith by conquered people, which is useless. This is implied in the statement "The nations you conquered wore themselves out in useless labor".

Thus, what is being implied in verse 13 is conversion to a form of faith, which is not based on truth but based on lies. It is present, when people are made to believe on a fictitious name, fictitious image and false doctrines and practices, which are the characteristics of the present Christianity, being heavily influenced by Roman Catholicism.

Proceeding from the above premises, we shall discuss in details the three (3) forms of lies and deceptions that are attached to the persona of Jesus Christ, which can be designated as the 'Trinity of Lies and Deceptions".

Lie # 1: The Name

Why Jesus is a false name?

On the premise that the name does not evolve into another form according to Darwinian theory of evolution, the name Jesus is grossly fictitious because there was no Jesus name that existed when the messiah, who has an existing Hebrew name that is pronounced as 'Yahushua',  was born until he was crucified. Notice that the name Jesus merely started to exist when letter 'J' in the English alphabet started to evolve 500 years ago. Also, assuming that there are so many languages worldwide, the pronunciation of a name in one language would less likely be different, when his name is being pronounced in other language.

It is because, despite the differences in languages, human beings have similar anatomical tongue, mouth and speaking and voice production organs. Unless, of course, if one has cleft palate or anatomical defects that may adversely affect his pronunciation. However, those with pronunciation defects are not logically expected to have significant influence on how a name is transliterated to another language, because any writer with serious pronunciation defects is less likely considered qualified.

Based on history, the name Jesus was transliterated from a Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous), which is being alleged to originate from an Aramaic name Yeshua. However, if directly transliterated to English, Yeshua becomes Joshua. Thus, Ἰησοῦς  did not , at all,  originate from the said Aramaic name. Neither, it logically originated from a Hebrew name, which is being pronounced as Yahushua, because a three-syllable name will not result to two-syllable transliterated English name Jesus.

The origin therefore of Jesus is Greek name Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous). Thus, he is deemed a fictitious Greek person and was not the one who was crucified on the cross to save humanity, because the messiah, who was crucified, was not Greek.

Also, notice that King James Version is found to have interesting problem in its use of the name Jesus. These are found in Acts 7:44-45 and Hebrews 4:7-8, stating as follows:
44 Our fathers had the tabernacle of witness in the wilderness, as he had appointed, speaking unto Moses, that he should make it according to the fashion that he had seen. 45 Which also our fathers that came after brought in with Jesus into the possession of the Gentiles, whom God drave out before the face of our fathers, unto the days of David; (Acts 7:44-45, KJV).

x x x

7 Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts.8 For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. (Hebrews 4:7-8, KJV).
Other versions, e,g, New International Version, International Standard Version, used Joshua instead of Jesus. Thus, the Bible made by men cannot be called holy at all because a single error logically makes it unholy. Worst, because the error is on the name, which is very critical in salvation.

Further, considering that the traces of the name of the Heavenly Father (YHVH) is no longer present in the name Jesus, it consequently follows that the promised salvation is likewise lost in said name.

Finally, therefore, due to the doubts on the validity of the English name Jesus, the remedy in order to be saved is to go back to the original Hebrew name of Christ, which is pronounced as 'Yahushua'.

Lie # 2: The Face

Why the false image?

One thing is certain of the alleged image of Christ in the Last Supper painting of Leonardo Da Vinci. Despite having been accepted by Christians and by the public, the logical and practical conclusion is only one-it is a false image of Christ. It is false because, first, Christ did not appear European. Neither did he appear like Cesare Borgia, who is the illegitimate son of Pope Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia). Second, Da Vinci had not seen the face of Christ and neither did he had seen the faces of Christ's apostles. Third, Da Vinci was only born in 1452 while Christ departed about 33 A.D.

In short, Da Vinci had no personal knowledge on the true image of Christ before he painted the image. Contrary to the imagination of artistic Christians therefore, Da Vinci is simply a false witness motivated by his worldly desire for fame. Consequently, those who believe on the image are merely deceived by traditional lies to believe on a false image of Christ.

Also, the image being professed to the world is contrary to the description in the scripture, more specifically, in Isaiah 53:2-3 or part of the suffering servant verses, which refer to the description of the returning Christ. The verses state as follows:
2 It was the will of the Lord that his servant grow like plant taking root in a dry ground. He had no dignity or beauty to make us notice of him. There is nothing attractive about him, nothing that would draw us to him.

3 We despised him and rejected him, he injured suffering and pain, No one would even look at him, we ignored him as if he were nothing. (Today's English Version)
Above verses would only confirm that the image painted by Da Vinci is a false image of Christ, because the image in the Last Supper is too handsome, attractive and appealing that nobody will ignore.

Worst, the image which is resembling the image of Cesare Borgia being accepted by Christians as Christ's image is an image of a product of illegitimacy, of one accused of killing his brother Giovanni Borgia and had sexual liaison with Sancha of Aragon, the wife of his younger brother Gioffre and an image of one who died in an ambush, after receiving a fatal injury from a spear and was thereafter stripped of luxurious garments, valuables and a leather mask covering half his face (disfigured possibly by syphilis during his late years) and finally, left lying naked, with just a red tile covering his genitals.[en.wiki16]

Clearly, therefore, the image that is being accepted as Christ by Christians is the image of one who died from fatal injury due to spear and left lying naked, with just a red tile covering his genitals and not the image of the one, who was crucified on the cross.

Finally, had it been that the second commandment of God (Exodus 20:4), which is also a divine warning, was obeyed, by not making images of anything in heaven, on earth or underneath the sea, said error could have been avoided by almost all Christians. Ironically, what remains as only truthful but deceitful image believed by Christians is the physical cross in honor of the cross constellation, which is likewise a violation of the second commandment of God.

In short, present Christians cannot boast of anything to support their allegation that they are deemed save in case of judgement.

Lie # 3: The Doctrines and Practices

Why the false doctrines and practices?

The 'Jesus is Christ' and 'Jesus is God' doctrines of Christians are gross falsities and products of evil deceptions to the highest degree because they are anchored on a false name and false image, which are discussed above and false holy trinity doctrine, which became the basis of various false doctrines and practices such as paganism and hypocrisy when praying, use of deceptive and dangerous "through Jesus name" in prayers and iconography or idolatry of the cross, saints and the alleged images of Christ and Mother Mary.

To re-stress, the theories that 'Jesus is Christ' and 'Christ is God' are not supported by history and scripture, respectively.  It is because, historically, no Jesus name existed at the time Christ was born until he was crucified, thus, the impossibility of the Jesus Christ name. Whereas, the Christ is God doctrine is being belied by Hebrews 2:17-18, which state as follows:
17 Therefore, in all things He had to be made like His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people. 18 For in that He Himself has suffered, being tempted, He is able to aid those who are tempted (New International Version).
In verse 17, it is expressly stated that Christ, in all things, had to be made like his brethren. Also, in verse 18, he also suffered having been tempted. That being so, he cannot be logically considered as God because he was also tempted having been made, in all things, like his brethren. Consequently, therefore, the holy trinity doctrine has to fall because Christ is not considered as God based on Hebrews 2:17-18.

While it is true that the Word (referring to the messiah) was God in John 1:1, if co-related to John 1:14, he can no longer be considered as God, when he became human, due to lack of a qualifying verse in King James Version stating that he continued to be God in his capacity as a man, which is further reinforced by Hebrews 2:17-18. John 1:1 and John 1:14 state as follows:
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. (John 1:1, KJV)
x x x
14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. (John 1:14, KJV)
Notice also that in New International Version (NIV), an attempt is being made to reinforce the theory that Christ is God, when it inserted in John 1:18 the phrase "who is himself God". It states:
18 No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and[b] is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known.
International Standard Version has a unique way of inserting the phrase. It states:
18 No one has ever seen God. The uniquely existing God,[o] who is close to the Father’s side, has revealed him.
Whereas, English Standard Version (ESV) states that:
18 No one has ever seen God; the only God,[e] who is at the Father's side,[f] he has made him known.
But, if you compare the NIV, ISV and ESV translations to King James Version, you will note the substantial difference of the three versions to the latter. King James Version states:
18 No one has seen God at any time. The only begotten Son,[f] who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him.
Based on the above translations, observe that the three (3) versions are in substantial conflict with King James Version, because they expressly state that the messiah is God but King James Version is clearly silent. How to resolve the conflict? To resolve it, Hebrews 2:17-18 can help, as the said verses confirm that Christ was made, in all things, as a man, who suffered because he was also tempted, therefore, he is not God.

Finally, therefore, based on the above disquisitions, the persona of Jesus Christ is doctrinally attended by three (3) forms of lies and evil deceptions through false name, false image and false doctrines and practices, which can be appropriately designated as trinity of lies and deceptions.

Related articles:
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Faith in hypocrisy

Roman Catholic faith promotes praying in public, especially, inside the Roman catholic building. Also, it promotes the alleged "holy" rosary prayer to be recited in public and in the alleged "church". You could hear these prayers in the malls and hear and see the three o'clock prayers in television. You can usually see publications showing the Pope kneeling and praying.  But what is being said in the scripture used by the Roman Catholic Alleged Church : 5 “When you pray, do not be like the hypocrites ! They love to stand up and pray in the houses of worship and on the street corners, so that everyone will see them. I assure you, they have already been paid in full. 6 But when you pray, go to your room, close the door, and pray to your Father, who is unseen. And your Father, who sees what you do in private, will reward you. Is praying in public a form of hypocrisy?
Post a Comment
Read more

Faith in pedophilia

The word "faith" connotes various meanings depending on what words are accompanying it in a sentence and who uses it. For example, it may mean faith in pedophilia. This is implied in  Pope Francis' warning against “administering a vaccine against faith”. Obviously, when he mentioned ‘vaccine against faith”, definitely, he is referring to “faith” as a disease because vaccines are only intended to prevent diseases. But when he further warned against ‘administering’ the vaccine, then he logically means that he is warning against the prevention of a disease.   Specifically, the statements are quoted as follows: “The pontiff said educational leaders should ask themselves “how can we proclaim Christ to a generation that is changing?” “We must be careful not to administer a vaccine against faith to them,” the 77-year-old added.”( http://ph.news.yahoo.com ) This is related to Roman Catholic Alleged Church way of presumably recent rethinking in dealing with the ‘ch
Post a Comment
Read more

Faith in paganism

Roman Catholic faith teaches on "holy" rosary prayer. It is being promoted to be prayed by Catholic families in their home and in some cases also recited inside the Roman catholic building, alleged as "church". But what is being said in the scripture used by the Roman Catholic Alleged Church : 7 “When you pray, do not use a lot of meaningless words, as the pagans do, who think that their gods will hear them because their prayers are long . 8 Do not be like them . Your Father already knows what you need before you ask him. 9 This, then, is how you should pray: ‘Our Father in heaven:May your holy name be honored; 10 may your Kingdom come; may your will be done on earth as it is in heaven;11 Give us today the food we need.12 Forgive us the wrongs we have done, as we forgive the wrongs that others have done to us. 13 Do not bring us to hard testing, but keep us safe from the Evil One. 14 “If you forgive others the wrongs they have d
Post a Comment
Read more

Faith in non-living icons

Is there a modern-day idolatry within Christianity? Roman Catholic church and the Orthodox Church have icons and iconography as part of their practices and doctrines. Said practices emanated not from early Christians, who were brutalized and killed by the Roman Empire, but from the Roman Empire itself. Is iconography the modern-day idolatry? Like in idolatry, the images in iconography are made by human hands. In all intentions, images, including statues, are made for the purpose of adoring and praising someone or something but excluding God as no person knows the exact image of God. On the other hand, Christ and his mother never furnished anybody their pictures while still living and thereafter, for purposes of identifying exactly their image by adoring individuals. So, their present alleged images are not authentic at all. That being the case, it follows that praising Christ and his mother through their alleged present artistic images is a product of deception. In the ca
Post a Comment
Read more